SHARE BROKERS ARE ELIGIBLE TO CLAIM BAD DEBTS AS EXPENSES
CASE LAW DETAILS
Decided by: Delhi High Court, In The case of:Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. Db (India) Securities Ltd., Appeal No.: ITA No. 415/2007, Order Dated: 02.07.2009.
SUMMARY OF CASE LAW
The assessee, a broker, purchased shares of the value of Rs.1,06,10,247 on behalf of its sub-broker. The sub-broker made payment of Rs.64 lakhs. As the remaining amount of Rs.41,37,881 was not paid, the assessee did not deliver those shares to the client though it offered the brokerage to tax. Since the balancepayment was not made even in the next year, the assessee claimed deduction of Rs. 41,37,881 as a “bad debt†u/s 36 (1) (vii). The Tribunal allowed the claim. On appeal by the Revenue to the High Court HELD:
(i) The contention of the Revenue that the said amount was not a “debt†u/s 36 (2) and, therefore, could not be treated as a “bad debt†was not acceptable because there was a valid transaction between the assessee and the sub-broker. The brokerage was offered to tax and assessed. The assessee had to make payment on behalf of the sub-broker and as he could not recover to the extent of Rs.41,37,881/-, that sum had to be treated as a “debtâ€.
(ii) However, as the assessee had retained the shares, the “bad debt†would have to be reduced by the sale proceeds of the said shares. The balance was allowable.
